Today's doll may or may not be Patty Duke, but I'm pretty sure she is.
I discovered this doll while digging around in a box of about a zillion Horsman Mary Poppins dolls and lookalikes that were brought out of the Room of Water. I had no idea who she was, so I started researching. She's a Horsman doll, because she's marked with an H. But the only doll I could find that she seemed she might be, was Patty Duke.
Her legs and arms 'can bend and pose in teen-age manner'. I know mine sure can't any more! |
Patty as Patty, (left), and Cathy,(right). |
The show was popular, and there was a Patty Duke board game, Whitman books, paper dolls, colouring book, and not one, but two Patty Duke dolls. The other one, called "Go Go with Patty Duke', was also made by Horsman, but had a totally different head sculpt. During the run of the show, Patty even had two hit records.
A Patty Duke doll and a paper doll book, from a doll show I went to a while back. |
But back to this doll. The problem with my theory though was that the Patty Duke doll had bangs, and this doll doesn't.
That doesn't necessarily mean anything though, because many times the short hair that makes up the bangs gets combed back so much it gets mixed in with the longer hair until it can't even be noticed any more. That's when you need to dig through the long hair and find the short hair, and reweave the bangs back out. I HATE reweaving hair. I have rewoven the parts in doll hair many times. It requires a needle and a fine tooth comb, and it takes ages. Let me reiterate: I HATE IT. So even though I dug around and found some short hairs that might be bangs length, I decided that I was not going to try to sort the rest out. I combed the hair back and just pulled back the top and sides like they would have originally been on the Patty Duke doll.
Originally the hair would have been bangs, with a rooted part between the bangs and the back portion, and layered hair in back. I think some of the shorter layer in back was used to somehow puff the pulled back part from underneath, to give it a teased look.
And all of it was very curly. This girl has lost her curl, and I'm definitely not the one to give it back to her. But I'm sure she can be rehabilitated by somebody.
She does have a very weird hairline in front, but she's not missing any plugs.
Even though she doesn't have bangs, (not that are visible at least), this has to be Patty Duke, because I can't find any other Horsman doll with this face, this colouring, and bendable arms and legs.
She has blue eyes with three side lashes, and orangey red lips. |
And this doll does have bendable arms and legs.
Ken wanted to know if she had an Excedrin headache. |
They're the kind with wires inside, rather than click bend or hinge jointed legs. (Not that there were very many hinge jointed dolls back when this doll was made, in 1965.) Her neck, arms, and legs are jointed and can move the usual ways too.
And like all the Horsman dolls like this, and their clones, and even Ideal's Tammy, she has little baby hands, instead of more mature lady hands.
Oh, and a great big head.
That's the doll for today.
See you again tomorrow.
What a beautiful and interesting doll. I’ve heard of Patty Duke, but never seen the show. It’s a little before my time. 😀 I like the face on this doll. She looks very friendly - though I don’t think the doll looks much like the actress. Maybe you can say that your doll is actually Patty Dukes’ cousin since she doesn’t have bangs.
ReplyDelete- Korglady
I was going to make the joke that the pictures where she's wearing the skirt are Cathy, and the ones where she's wearing the pants are Patty, but I forgot to!
Delete